don t let the man

The argument between O and M in the last presidential campaign debate has inspired many people to think about what would be a good economic plan for present US.

The first issue that they talk about is the tax plan. O basically proposes to lower mid-to-low income familyapos;s tax while raising high income familyapos;s. First of all, this policy obviously weakens the companies in the US. Second, he is trying to distribute wealth into more peopleapos;s hands, which may encourage them to spend more money into the market and thus improve the economy. However, without directing their spending into American products, those profits may be earned by foreign companies. Third, he is trying to cater the majority of American and thus attract more votes. This is somewhat like sacrificing the future of US to realize his own political ambition.

He also proposes to provide tax benefits for the companies who can provide jobs for local American. With his another policy that helps American people be better educated, this is a real good plan.

On the other hand, M proposes to lower corporation tax. He does pretty well in helping US companies have an easier life and be more competitive in the world, but he fails to increase wealth that mid-to-low income family have, which is the majority of American people. It may not be true that, as he say, more successful US companies create more jobs for US people. They may invest their new profits or they may outsource the new jobs...anyway, it just helps the rich richer, but guarantees nothing else.

In my opinion, a successful president does not only satisfy majority of or a portion of the people in his country, but also has the commission to invent the country a good future. This can be and only can be satisfied by guarantee both that the country has enough amount of successful companies providing jobs, controlling the worldapos;s market and thus leading the worldapos;s economy and that those jobs are taken by the people of the companiesapos; own country. The reason why there has to be companies from that country is, companies always leads the economy and also they always exploit and thus earn from their employees. Those extra profits are really awarding. In this way, the country is really earning money from others and it is the people from that country who are enjoying the profits.

What we may do to realize that goal?
Lower tax for those companies who creates jobs for local people +
Help the majority of people be better educated and more competitive in job market
This doesnapos;t put the burden of lower national income because of mass tax cut onto the government, while creating more both employersapos; and employeesapos; income and thus increasing the government tax income in the end.

california loan savings, don t let the man, don t let the bedbugs bite, don t let the bastards grind, don t let the bastards.